Troy A. Williams v. State of Iowa

Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided May 31, 2019·No. 17-0431·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 17–0431

Scott County No. PCCE126221 ORDER

TROY A. WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee.

The court, McDonald, J., taking no part, being evenly divided, declares this case affirmed by operation of law. See Iowa Code § 602.4107 (2019).

Waterman, Mansfield, and Christensen, JJ., would affirm the judgment of the district court; Cady, C.J., and Wiggins and Appel, JJ., would reverse the judgment of the district court. See State v. Effler, 769 N.W.2d 880, 884 (Iowa 2009) (“[W]hen the supreme court is equally divided on an issue upon which the district court and court of appeals differ, the decision of the district court is affirmed by operation of law.”). Copies to:

Eric David Tindal Keegan and Farnsworth, PC 103 East College Street, Suite 312 Iowa City, IA 52240

Kevin Cmelik Tyler Buller Assistant Attorneys General Criminal Appeals Division Hoover State Office Building, 2nd Floor Des Moines, IA 50319–0106

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Troy A. Williams v. State of Iowa, (iowa 2019).

Troy A. Williams v. State of Iowa (Troy A. Williams v. State of Iowa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Effler
769 N.W.2d 880 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2009)