Troy A. Williams v. State of Iowa
This text of Troy A. Williams v. State of Iowa (Troy A. Williams v. State of Iowa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 17–0431
Scott County No. PCCE126221
ORDER
TROY A. WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant,
vs.
STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee.
The court, McDonald, J., taking no part, being evenly divided, declares this case
affirmed by operation of law. See Iowa Code § 602.4107 (2019).
Waterman, Mansfield, and Christensen, JJ., would affirm the judgment of the
district court; Cady, C.J., and Wiggins and Appel, JJ., would reverse the judgment of the
district court. See State v. Effler, 769 N.W.2d 880, 884 (Iowa 2009) (“[W]hen the
supreme court is equally divided on an issue upon which the district court and court of
appeals differ, the decision of the district court is affirmed by operation of law.”).
Copies to:
Eric David Tindal Keegan and Farnsworth, PC 103 East College Street, Suite 312 Iowa City, IA 52240 Kevin Cmelik Tyler Buller Assistant Attorneys General Criminal Appeals Division Hoover State Office Building, 2nd Floor Des Moines, IA 50319–0106
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Troy A. Williams v. State of Iowa, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/troy-a-williams-v-state-of-iowa-iowa-2019.