Troy A. Williams v. State of Iowa
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 17–0431
Scott County No. PCCE126221 ORDER
TROY A. WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant,
vs.
STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee.
The court, McDonald, J., taking no part, being evenly divided, declares this case affirmed by operation of law. See Iowa Code § 602.4107 (2019).
Waterman, Mansfield, and Christensen, JJ., would affirm the judgment of the district court; Cady, C.J., and Wiggins and Appel, JJ., would reverse the judgment of the district court. See State v. Effler, 769 N.W.2d 880, 884 (Iowa 2009) (“[W]hen the supreme court is equally divided on an issue upon which the district court and court of appeals differ, the decision of the district court is affirmed by operation of law.”). Copies to:
Eric David Tindal Keegan and Farnsworth, PC 103 East College Street, Suite 312 Iowa City, IA 52240
Kevin Cmelik Tyler Buller Assistant Attorneys General Criminal Appeals Division Hoover State Office Building, 2nd Floor Des Moines, IA 50319–0106
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Troy A. Williams v. State of Iowa (Troy A. Williams v. State of Iowa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.