Trowbridge v. Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities of the Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities

88 F. App'x 454
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided February 23, 2004·No. Docket No. 03-7339·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Finding no abuse of discretion in the District Court’s denial of appellants’ Rule 60(b) motion, we affirm the order of the District Court, for substantially the reasons stated by Judge Johnson in his Memorandum and Order, see Trowbridge v. Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, 2003 WL 21143086 (E.D.N.Y. Mar.3, 2003). We also reject the request, made in appellants’ October 22, 2003 brief on this appeal, that this Court recall the mandate that was issued on July 31, 2001, dismissing the prior appeal.

The judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trowbridge v. Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities of the Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities, 88 F. App'x 454 (2d Cir. 2004).

88 F. App'x 454 (Trowbridge v. Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities of the Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mantis Transportation v. Kenner
45 F. Supp. 3d 229 (E.D. New York, 2014)