Trowbridge v. Caulkins

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Trowbridge v. Caulkins

23 A. 1102, 17 R.I. 580, 1892 R.I. LEXIS 38

DecidedJanuary 23, 1892

StatusPublished

This text of 23 A. 1102 (Trowbridge v. Caulkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trowbridge v. Caulkins, 23 A. 1102, 17 R.I. 580, 1892 R.I. LEXIS 38 (R.I. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are of opinion that partition should not be decreed against the respondents’ objections thereto, so long as the mortgage and other debts remain outstanding. Hendry v. Hollingdrake, 16 R. I. 477.

We will overrule the demurrer and allow the cause to stand until the lien for debts upon the estates of which partition is *581 sought is extinguished, unless the parties interested consent in the mean time to a partition.

Charles C. Mumford, for complainants. John Erastus Lester, for respondents, Caulkins and wife. Isaac H. Southwick, Jun., for the other respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We are of opinion that partition should not be decreed against the respondents’ objections thereto, so long as the mortgage and other debts remain outstanding. Hendry v. Hollingdrake, 16 R. I. 477.

We will overrule the demurrer and allow the cause to stand until the lien for debts upon the estates of which partition is *581 sought is extinguished, unless the parties interested consent in the mean time to a partition.

Charles C. Mumford, for complainants. John Erastus Lester, for respondents, Caulkins and wife. Isaac H. Southwick, Jun., for the other respondents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A. 1102, 17 R.I. 580, 1892 R.I. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trowbridge-v-caulkins-ri-1892.