Trowbridge Hardware Co. v. Chapman
This text of 141 S.E. 203 (Trowbridge Hardware Co. v. Chapman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The exception in this case is to a judgment refusing an interlocutory injunction against further proceeding by a constable to enforce a justice-court fi. fa. by levy and sale of personal property; it being insisted that the fi. fa. and the judgment on which it is based are void. The petitioner (defendant in fi. fa.) had previously interposed an affidavit of illegality on the same ground, which had been overruled, which ruling was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. Anderson v. Trowbridge Hardware Co., 36 Ga. App. 776 (138 S. E. 250). Held, that the court did not err in refusing'an injunction.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
141 S.E. 203, 165 Ga. 448, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trowbridge-hardware-co-v-chapman-ga-1928.