Trow v. Singleton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Trow v. Singleton

132 So. 3d 1216, 2014 WL 656741, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2373

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 21, 2014

DocketNo. 5D13-467

StatusPublished

This text of 132 So. 3d 1216 (Trow v. Singleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trow v. Singleton, 132 So. 3d 1216, 2014 WL 656741, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2373 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because there was a lack of “summary judgment evidence” to support all of the necessary allegations set forth in Appel-lees’ motion for summary judgment, we are compelled to reverse. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c) (“The motion shall state with particularity the grounds upon which it is based and the substantial matters of law to be argued and shall specifically identify any affidavits, answers to interrogatories, admissions, depositions, and other materials as would be admissible in evidence (“summary judgment evidence”) on which the movant relies.... The judgment sought shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings and summary judgment evidence on file show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”).

REVERSED.

ORFINGER, EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because there was a lack of “summary judgment evidence” to support all of the necessary allegations set forth in Appel-lees’ motion for summary judgment, we are compelled to reverse. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c) (“The motion shall state with particularity the grounds upon which it is based and the substantial matters of law to be argued and shall specifically identify any affidavits, answers to interrogatories, admissions, depositions, and other materials as would be admissible in evidence (“summary judgment evidence”) on which the movant relies.... The judgment sought shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings and summary judgment evidence on file show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”).

REVERSED.

ORFINGER, EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 So. 3d 1216, 2014 WL 656741, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trow-v-singleton-fladistctapp-2014.