Troutt v. State

660 S.W.2d 941, 281 Ark. 68, 1983 Ark. LEXIS 1580
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedDecember 5, 1983
StatusPublished

This text of 660 S.W.2d 941 (Troutt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Troutt v. State, 660 S.W.2d 941, 281 Ark. 68, 1983 Ark. LEXIS 1580 (Ark. 1983).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Robert Troutt, by one of his attorneys, William L. Wharton, filed a motion for a rule on the clerk and to stay mandate. William L. Wharton filed an affidavit admitting the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part in figuring the due date.

As stated in our per curiam of February 5,1979,265 Ark. 964, the mistake of an attorney in a criminal case is good cause when the attorney admits, by affidavit, that it was his mistake in figuring the due date.

The motion to withdraw mandate is denied because the mandate has not been handed down.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
660 S.W.2d 941, 281 Ark. 68, 1983 Ark. LEXIS 1580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/troutt-v-state-ark-1983.