Troutman v. Troutman
This text of 84 S.E.2d 295 (Troutman v. Troutman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tbe sole question to be determined by tbe jury was whether tbe property settlement made between tbe parties at tbe time they entered into tbe separation agreement, which settlement was not reduced to writing, included a settlement of any and all liability on tbe part of tbe defendant to tbe plaintiff by reason of tbe execution and delivery of tbe aforesaid notes. The jury beard the evidence and, upon tbe facts found therefrom, returned a verdict in favor of tbe defendant.
No prejudicial error appears in tbe charge of tbe court, and no sufficient reason is disclosed on tbe record that would justify disturbing tbe verdict rendered.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 S.E.2d 295, 241 N.C. 71, 1954 N.C. LEXIS 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/troutman-v-troutman-nc-1954.