Troutman v. Troutman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Troutman v. Troutman

504 S.W.3d 754, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 858, 2016 WL 4530434

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 30, 2016

DocketWD 78778

StatusPublished

This text of 504 S.W.3d 754 (Troutman v. Troutman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Troutman v. Troutman, 504 S.W.3d 754, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 858, 2016 WL 4530434 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The marriage of Appellant Larry Dale Troutman (“Husband”) and Respondent Laura Mae Troutman (“Wife”) was dissolved in April 2000. Wife filed a motion for contempt in June 2014, alleging that Husband had failed to comply with provisions of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (“QDRO”) concerning the division of military retirement benefits Husband earned during the marriage. The circuit court found Husband in contempt, and awarded Wife relief to compensate her for Husband’s contempt. Husband appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The marriage of Appellant Larry Dale Troutman (“Husband”) and Respondent Laura Mae Troutman (“Wife”) was dissolved in April 2000. Wife filed a motion for contempt in June 2014, alleging that Husband had failed to comply with provisions of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (“QDRO”) concerning the division of military retirement benefits Husband earned during the marriage. The circuit court found Husband in contempt, and awarded Wife relief to compensate her for Husband’s contempt. Husband appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

504 S.W.3d 754, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 858, 2016 WL 4530434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/troutman-v-troutman-moctapp-2016.