Troutman v. State

114 S.W.2d 1176, 134 Tex. Crim. 408, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 390
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 23, 1938
DocketNo. 19555.
StatusPublished

This text of 114 S.W.2d 1176 (Troutman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Troutman v. State, 114 S.W.2d 1176, 134 Tex. Crim. 408, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 390 (Tex. 1938).

Opinions

The offense is selling whisky in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $150.00 and thirty days' confinement in jail. *Page 409

Porter L. Williams, an inspector of the Texas Liquor Control Board, testified that on the 17th day of May, 1937, he went to appellant's home and bought a pint of whisky from her. The proof on the part of the State was sufficient to show that Cherokee County was a dry area.

The complaint and information failed to allege in terms that the commissioners' court had canvassed the returns of the election and declared the result. However, we find an averment therein as follows: "And thereupon the commissioners' court of said county aforesaid, did pass an order declaring the result of said election, and prohibiting the sale of intoxicating liquors in said Cherokee County, Texas."

We quote from Branch's Ann. P. C., Sec. 1224, as follows: "It is not necessary to allege in terms that the commissioners' court had declared the result of the election; an allegation that the commissioners' court had made an order prohibiting the sale of intoxicating liquors is broad enough to embrace that proposition."

In support of the text many authorities are cited, among them being Holloway v. State, 110 S.W. 745.

We are constrained to hold that it was sufficiently averred that the sale of intoxicating liquor had been prohibited.

The judgment is affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

ON REQUEST TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holloway v. State
110 S.W. 745 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 S.W.2d 1176, 134 Tex. Crim. 408, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/troutman-v-state-texcrimapp-1938.