Troutman v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Troutman v. State

155 S.E. 792, 42 Ga. App. 278, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 341

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 11, 1930

Docket20784

StatusPublished

This text of 155 S.E. 792 (Troutman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Troutman v. State, 155 S.E. 792, 42 Ga. App. 278, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 341 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.,

1. In the light of the entire charge of the court and the facts of the case, the grounds of the, motion for a new trial alleging errors of commission and of omission in the charge are without substantial merit.

2. The verdict was amply authorized .by the evidence, the charge was full and fair and clearly presented the contentions of the accused, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error. ''

Judgment affirmed.

Lúke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.,

1. In the light of the entire charge of the court and the facts of the case, the grounds of the, motion for a new trial alleging errors of commission and of omission in the charge are without substantial merit.

2. The verdict was amply authorized .by the evidence, the charge was full and fair and clearly presented the contentions of the accused, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error. ''

Judgment affirmed.

Lúke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 S.E. 792, 42 Ga. App. 278, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/troutman-v-state-gactapp-1930.