Troutman Lumber Co. v. National Manufacturing Co.

89 S.E. 198, 145 Ga. 315, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 296
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 14, 1916·Published

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

1. This case is controlled in principle by the decisions in Wylly v. Collins, 9 Ga. 223, 240; Weaver v. Nixon, 69 Ga. 699 (2) ; Keller v. Singleton, 69 Ga. 703, 704; Norton v. Paragon Oil Can Co., 98 Ga. 468 (25 S. E. 501).

2. In the instant case suit was brought on an open account claimed to be due by a firm. The plea was that it had been settled and discharged [316]*316by the acceptance of a promissory note, under seal, of one of the members of the firm. On the trial the defendants admitted a prima facie case, and assumed the burden of proof. Under the uneontradicted evidence, there was no error in directing a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

June 14, 1916. Complaint. Before Judge Park. Baldwin superior court. March 23, 1915. Mines & Vinson, for plaintiffs in error. Allen & Pottle, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices_ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Troutman Lumber Co. v. National Manufacturing Co., 89 S.E. 198, 145 Ga. 315, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 296 (Ga. 1916).

89 S.E. 198 (Troutman Lumber Co. v. National Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wylly v. S. Z. Collins & Co.
9 Ga. 223 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1851)
Weaver v. Nixon & Wester
69 Ga. 699 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1882)
Keller v. Singleton, Hunt & Co.
69 Ga. 703 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1882)
Norton v. Paragon Oil Can Co.
25 S.E. 501 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1896)