Trousdale v. State
Opinion
The defendant was indicted under section 3883 of the Code of 1923. The evidence tended to prove that the defendant was at or near a church in the Brick Community, while services were being held; that he was drunk and manifested a drunken condition by boisterous or indecent conduct or loud and profane discourse. The evidente was somewhat in conflict, but was sufficient to make a jury question.
What transpired at the Morrison home a short time before defendant went to the church was relevant as tending to prove the defendant’s condition-. • If he was drunk and rowdy at the Morrison home fifteen or twenty minutes before he went to the church, that facj; would tend to prove his condition at the church. . ■ •
- We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed-.
Affirtífed.'
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
142 So. 684 (Trousdale v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.