Trousdale v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Trousdale v. State

142 So. 684, 25 Ala. App. 174, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 150

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 14, 1932

Docket8 Div. 556.

StatusPublished

This text of 142 So. 684 (Trousdale v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trousdale v. State, 142 So. 684, 25 Ala. App. 174, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 150 (Ala. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The defendant was indicted under section 3883 of the Code of 1923. The evidence tended to prove that the defendant was at or near a church in the Brick Community, while services were being held; that he was drunk and manifested a drunken condition by boisterous or indecent conduct or loud and profane discourse. The evidente was somewhat in conflict, but was sufficient to make a jury question.

What transpired at the Morrison home a short time before defendant went to the church was relevant as tending to prove the defendant’s condition-. • If he was drunk and rowdy at the Morrison home fifteen or twenty minutes before he went to the church, that facj; would tend to prove his condition at the church. . ■ •

- We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed-.

Affirtífed.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

The defendant was indicted under section 3883 of the Code of 1923. The evidence tended to prove that the defendant was at or near a church in the Brick Community, while services were being held; that he was drunk and manifested a drunken condition by boisterous or indecent conduct or loud and profane discourse. The evidente was somewhat in conflict, but was sufficient to make a jury question.

What transpired at the Morrison home a short time before defendant went to the church was relevant as tending to prove the defendant’s condition-. • If he was drunk and rowdy at the Morrison home fifteen or twenty minutes before he went to the church, that facj; would tend to prove his condition at the church. . ■ •

- We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed-.

Affirtífed.'

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

142 So. 684, 25 Ala. App. 174, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trousdale-v-state-alactapp-1932.