Troup v. Midland-Ross Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Troup v. Midland-Ross Corp.

94 A.D.2d 949, 464 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18421

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 25, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 94 A.D.2d 949 (Troup v. Midland-Ross Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Troup v. Midland-Ross Corp., 94 A.D.2d 949, 464 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18421 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The statements of third-party defendant’s employees enjoyed a qualified privilege as material prepared for litigation (CPLR 3101, subd [d]; Shiu Yu Liang v Bateman, 68 AD2d 934). Nevertheless, once they were released to third-party defendant Bethlehem pursuant to CPLR 3101 (subd [e]), the liberal disclosure policy underlying CPLR 3101 required full disclosure in this multiparty action (see Siegel, Supplementary Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3101:13, 1982-1983 Pocket Part, pp 24-25). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Bayger, J. — discovery.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The statements of third-party defendant’s employees enjoyed a qualified privilege as material prepared for litigation (CPLR 3101, subd [d]; Shiu Yu Liang v Bateman, 68 AD2d 934). Nevertheless, once they were released to third-party defendant Bethlehem pursuant to CPLR 3101 (subd [e]), the liberal disclosure policy underlying CPLR 3101 required full disclosure in this multiparty action (see Siegel, Supplementary Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3101:13, 1982-1983 Pocket Part, pp 24-25). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Bayger, J. — discovery.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Schnepp, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 A.D.2d 949, 464 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/troup-v-midland-ross-corp-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack