Troughton v. . Johnston

3 N.C. 328
CourtSuperior Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 5, 1804
StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.C. 328 (Troughton v. . Johnston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Troughton v. . Johnston, 3 N.C. 328 (N.C. Ct. App. 1804).

Opinion

The negro sued for belonged to Troughton, and was pledged to Johnston as security for a sum of money due from the former to the latter. Four years intervened, and the negro was exposed to public auction by direction of Troughton, and bid off by Johnston. *Page 278 It is now said the purchase by Johnston was a mere pretence, and by agreement between him and Troughton, the real object having been to sell to Kirk, a buyer of negroes, by running him up to a high price, and by bidding off for Troughton, if Kirk would not bid as high as the sum contemplated. Such agreement is fraudulent, and Troughton, a party to that fraud, cannot allege for the purpose of avoiding the sale. But if the jury think a new agreement was made afterwards, which revested the property in Troughton, then the sale has lost its effect.

NOTE. — See Smith v. Greenlee, 13 N.C. 126.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Den Ex Dem. Smith v. Greenlee
13 N.C. 126 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1829)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 N.C. 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/troughton-v-johnston-ncsuperct-1804.