Trotti v. Neams

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Trotti v. Neams

105 S.E. 444, 115 S.C. 292, 1920 S.C. LEXIS 228

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided December 20, 1920·No. 10541·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chiee Justice Gary.

1, 2 For the reason assigned by his Honor, the Circuit Judge, in sustaining the demurrer, and the appellant having failed to satisfy this Court that he erroneously exercised his discretion in refusing to allow the defendant to amend his answer, the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Hydrick, Watts and Fraser concur. Mr. Justice Gage did not take part on account of sickness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chiee Justice Gary.

1, 2 For the reason assigned by his Honor, the Circuit Judge, in sustaining the demurrer, and the appellant having failed to satisfy this Court that he erroneously exercised his discretion in refusing to allow the defendant to amend his answer, the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Hydrick, Watts and Fraser concur. Mr. Justice Gage did not take part on account of sickness.

Trotti v. Neams, 105 S.E. 444, 115 S.C. 292, 1920 S.C. LEXIS 228 (S.C. 1920).

Pincite

105 S.E. 444 (Trotti v. Neams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.