Trotti v. Neams

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Trotti v. Neams

105 S.E. 444, 115 S.C. 292, 1920 S.C. LEXIS 228

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedDecember 20, 1920

Docket10541

StatusPublished

This text of 105 S.E. 444 (Trotti v. Neams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trotti v. Neams, 105 S.E. 444, 115 S.C. 292, 1920 S.C. LEXIS 228 (S.C. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chiee Justice Gary.

1, 2 For the reason assigned by his Honor, the Circuit Judge, in sustaining the demurrer, and the appellant having failed to satisfy this Court that he erroneously exercised his discretion in refusing to allow the defendant to amend his answer, the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Hydrick, Watts and Fraser concur. Mr. Justice Gage did not take part on account of sickness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chiee Justice Gary.

1, 2 For the reason assigned by his Honor, the Circuit Judge, in sustaining the demurrer, and the appellant having failed to satisfy this Court that he erroneously exercised his discretion in refusing to allow the defendant to amend his answer, the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Hydrick, Watts and Fraser concur. Mr. Justice Gage did not take part on account of sickness.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 S.E. 444, 115 S.C. 292, 1920 S.C. LEXIS 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trotti-v-neams-sc-1920.