Trotters v. Winchester

1 Mo. 413
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedNovember 15, 1823
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Mo. 413 (Trotters v. Winchester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trotters v. Winchester, 1 Mo. 413 (Mo. 1823).

Opinion

M’Girk, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was a bill in Chancery, in the Circuit Court of New Madrid county. A decree was there given for the defendant in Chancery, and an appeal taken to this Court. This bill seeks to set aside a will, whereon probate was granted, on the ground that two of the subscribing witnesses were incompetent, because they were devisees and legatees. That such witnesses are incompetent, there can be no doubt. But this is no case for Chancery. The remedy is at law. The case of Tyne and Humphrey, decided at this term of the Court, governs this case. The Couit below, on the hearing, should have dismissed this bill; and because the Court did not do so, the decree is erroneous.

The decree is reversed, and the appellant recover his costs in this appeal •>. the complainant’s bill is dismissed without prejudice, and the defendant in the Court below recover the costs of that Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. McDonald
233 S.W.2d 19 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Mo. 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trotters-v-winchester-mo-1823.