Trotter v. Vandegraff
This text of 18 Ky. 79 (Trotter v. Vandegraff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Trotter sued Yandegraff, -upon an account for money and merchandize sold and delivered. Yandegraff^.1’ pleaded a set-off, for services. Oh the trial, the defen-dantgavein evidence a letter from Trotter, of the year 1814, expressing a desire to employ him as the principal clerk for the store and the White Lead Company, 6ne year, offering him nine hundred dollars, and-setting [80]*80forth the leisure which he would have, which he ftilgifl devote to other business, &c. He proved, that shortly after the date of that letter, he entered into that service, and continued until the year 1818. No further stipulation was proved, and it was for the latter period that Vandegraff claimed wages. It was objected, that the letter was inadmissible; but the court decided differently. Other questions are made, but they were exclusively for the jury.
We cannot doubt the competency of this letter, as it might justly influence the deliberations of the jury, whether they would enquire into the duties expected of the defendant, or the compensation due him, although not conclusive as to either.
Judgment affirmed with costs5 and damages at the rate of six per centum per annum, &c.
Absent, Ch, J. Barry.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 Ky. 79, 2 T.B. Mon. 79, 1825 Ky. LEXIS 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trotter-v-vandegraff-kyctapp-1825.