Trotter v. State

746 So. 2d 1208, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16886, 1999 WL 1188810
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 16, 1999·No. No. 99-2469·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal of the dismissal of a pro se motion to correct illegal sentence, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), appellant claims that his scoresheet was incorrectly calculated. The trial court dismissed the motion for lack of jurisdiction, stating that appellant’s earlier 3.800 motion, raising substantially the same claims, was pending on appeal. See Jordon v. State, 631 So.2d 362 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). However, the appeal upon which the trial court based its dismissal had already been dismissed by this court. The trial court did have jurisdiction to consider the' motion at the time appellant filed the present motion. Accordingly, we reverse and remand the matter to the trial court for consideration of the motion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

BOOTH, MINER, and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trotter v. State, 746 So. 2d 1208, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16886, 1999 WL 1188810 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

746 So. 2d 1208 (Trotter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peterson v. State
746 So. 2d 1208 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)