Trotter v. State

529 So. 2d 344, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1837, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3523, 1988 WL 80126
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 4, 1988
DocketNo. 87-1778
StatusPublished

This text of 529 So. 2d 344 (Trotter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trotter v. State, 529 So. 2d 344, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1837, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3523, 1988 WL 80126 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Trotter appeals from his guidelines sentence on the grounds that the guidelines scoresheet was erroneously scored. We agree. The burglary, which was scored as an additional offense at conviction, was scored as a second degree felony. Inasmuch as it is clear from the record1 that the burglary for which the defendant was charged and convicted is a third degree felony, the scoresheet is incorrect. The maximum guidelines sentence was therefore 8% instead of 4V2 years.

Sentence reversed and cause remanded for resentencing.

ERVIN, JOANOS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
529 So. 2d 344, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1837, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3523, 1988 WL 80126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trotter-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.