Trotter v. Merchants & Farmers Bank

186 S.E. 371, 180 S.C. 449, 105 A.L.R. 1512, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 139
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJune 11, 1936
Docket14311
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 186 S.E. 371 (Trotter v. Merchants & Farmers Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trotter v. Merchants & Farmers Bank, 186 S.E. 371, 180 S.C. 449, 105 A.L.R. 1512, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 139 (S.C. 1936).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fishburne.

This action was brought by T. K. Trotter, Receiver of the Bank of Bethune, against Merchants & Farmers Bank of Bethune, to recover the sum of $4,445.53, which amount had been previously paid to the defendant bank by the former Receiver of the Bank of Bethune as a preferential claim.

The cause was referred to the Master for Kershaw County, who found all issues of law and fact against the defendant. Upon exceptions being taken to the Circuit Court, the Referee’s report was confirmed in its entirety. The appeal to this Court involves and comprehends *459 the same issues which were before the Master and the Circuit Court, except that it, for the first time, brings into the case the question as to whether the transaction in litigation constituted a trust ex maleficio. As this issue was not presented to nor passed upon by the Circuit Court, it may not be considered here.

Upon a careful consideration of the record and the issues made by the exceptions, this Court is satisfied with the findings of fact and conclusions of law reached by the Master and confirmed by the Circuit Court. As additional support to the Circuit decree, we cite the case of South Carolina State Bank v. Citizens’ Bank, 173 S. C., 496, 176 S. E., 346, 95 A. L. R., 667, where similar and applicable principles of law are discussed.

Let the report of the Master, commencing at “Findings of Fact,” be reported, together with the decree of the Circuit Court.

All exceptions are overruled.

It is the judgment of this Court that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Stabler and Messrs. Justices Carter, Bonham and Baker concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. State
87 S.E.2d 577 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1955)
United States v. State of Sc
87 S.E.2d 577 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1955)
Oeland v. Kimbrell's Furniture Co., Inc.
42 S.E.2d 228 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 S.E. 371, 180 S.C. 449, 105 A.L.R. 1512, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trotter-v-merchants-farmers-bank-sc-1936.