Trotter v. McKoy

83 S.E. 857, 142 Ga. 820, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 561
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 17, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 83 S.E. 857 (Trotter v. McKoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trotter v. McKoy, 83 S.E. 857, 142 Ga. 820, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 561 (Ga. 1914).

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

While the evidence in favor of the plaintiff was strong, and that in favor of the defendant was weak, still it can not he held that there was no conflict, and that the case was one which fell within Civil Code (1910), § 5986, so as to authorize the presiding judge to direct a verdict.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent. Complaint. Before George A. H. Harris, judge pro hac vice. Chattooga superior court. September 8, 1913. J. M. Bellah and Maddox & Doyal, for plaintiff in error. Wesley Shropshire, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Evans v. Stephens
156 S.E. 279 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Cook v. Washington
143 S.E. 409 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 S.E. 857, 142 Ga. 820, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trotter-v-mckoy-ga-1914.