Trotter v. McKoy

83 S.E. 857, 142 Ga. 820, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 561
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 17, 1914·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

While the evidence in favor of the plaintiff was strong, and that in favor of the defendant was weak, still it can not he held that there was no conflict, and that the case was one which fell within Civil Code (1910), § 5986, so as to authorize the presiding judge to direct a verdict.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent. Complaint. Before George A. H. Harris, judge pro hac vice. Chattooga superior court. September 8, 1913. J. M. Bellah and Maddox & Doyal, for plaintiff in error. Wesley Shropshire, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trotter v. McKoy, 83 S.E. 857, 142 Ga. 820, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 561 (Ga. 1914).

83 S.E. 857 (Trotter v. McKoy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Evans v. Stephens
156 S.E. 279 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Cook v. Washington
143 S.E. 409 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)