Trotman v. Thomas

16 So. 2d 640, 154 Fla. 71, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 624
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 8, 1944
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 16 So. 2d 640 (Trotman v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trotman v. Thomas, 16 So. 2d 640, 154 Fla. 71, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 624 (Fla. 1944).

Opinion

ADAMS, J.:

The questions presented by this appeal are the propriety of habeas corpus to obtain custody of a minor child and the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the order appealed from.

It is the law beyond question that habeas corpus is a proper remedy in such cases. We find the evidence sufficient to sustain the judgment, hence the same is affirmed.

BUFORD, C. J., BROWN, CHAPMAN and SEBRING, JJ., concur. THOMAS, J., dissents. TERRELL, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 So. 2d 640, 154 Fla. 71, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trotman-v-thomas-fla-1944.