Trotman v. Thomas

16 So. 2d 640, 154 Fla. 71, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 624
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 8, 1944·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ADAMS, J.:

The questions presented by this appeal are the propriety of habeas corpus to obtain custody of a minor child and the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the order appealed from.

It is the law beyond question that habeas corpus is a proper remedy in such cases. We find the evidence sufficient to sustain the judgment, hence the same is affirmed.

BUFORD, C. J., BROWN, CHAPMAN and SEBRING, JJ., concur. THOMAS, J., dissents. TERRELL, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trotman v. Thomas, 16 So. 2d 640, 154 Fla. 71, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 624 (Fla. 1944).

16 So. 2d 640 (Trotman v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related