Trotman v. Santaella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Trotman v. Santaella

100 A.D.2d 592, 473 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17569

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 19, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 100 A.D.2d 592 (Trotman v. Santaella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trotman v. Santaella, 100 A.D.2d 592, 473 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17569 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the respondent New York State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated July 5, 1983, which affirmed a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights which, after a hearing, dismissed petitioner’s complaint against respondents White Rose Foods Corporation, Angelo Sanzeri and Frank Taglianti. K Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. 11 The commissioner’s determination is based upon findings of fact which are supported by substantial evidence in the record and therefore should not be disturbed (Executive Law, § 298). Niehoff, J. P., Rubin, Boyers, and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the respondent New York State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated July 5, 1983, which affirmed a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights which, after a hearing, dismissed petitioner’s complaint against respondents White Rose Foods Corporation, Angelo Sanzeri and Frank Taglianti. K Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. 11 The commissioner’s determination is based upon findings of fact which are supported by substantial evidence in the record and therefore should not be disturbed (Executive Law, § 298). Niehoff, J. P., Rubin, Boyers, and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 A.D.2d 592, 473 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trotman-v-santaella-nyappdiv-1984.