Trotman v. Bryant

Fourth Circuit

Trotman v. Bryant

193 F. App'x 208

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 2, 2006·No. No. 06-6510·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Steven Henry Trotman appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to extend time to file a notice of appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We deny Trotman’s motion to appoint counsel, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Trotman v. Bryant, No. 0:03-cv-02729-RBH (D.S.C. Mar. 1, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Steven Henry Trotman appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to extend time to file a notice of appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We deny Trotman’s motion to appoint counsel, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Trotman v. Bryant, No. 0:03-cv-02729-RBH (D.S.C. Mar. 1, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Trotman v. Bryant, 193 F. App'x 208 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

193 F. App'x 208 (Trotman v. Bryant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.