Troth v. Troth

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Troth v. Troth

8 N.J. Eq. 237

DecidedMarch 15, 1850

StatusPublished

This text of 8 N.J. Eq. 237 (Troth v. Troth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Troth v. Troth, 8 N.J. Eq. 237 (N.J. Ct. App. 1850).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancellor.

I do not see that this is a case for the interposition of this Court by injunction, or rather for the retaining of an injunction, under the bill and answer.

. The constitutional question is more proper for a Court of law, and can easily be raised by a proceeding at law by the land owner, the complainant here, after he shall have ascertained what rule of damages the Company claim.

Injunction dissolved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancellor.

I do not see that this is a case for the interposition of this Court by injunction, or rather for the retaining of an injunction, under the bill and answer.

. The constitutional question is more proper for a Court of law, and can easily be raised by a proceeding at law by the land owner, the complainant here, after he shall have ascertained what rule of damages the Company claim.

Injunction dissolved.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 N.J. Eq. 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/troth-v-troth-njch-1850.