Trost v. Fox
22 La. Ann. 410
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Trost v. Fox. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 La. Ann. 261 →
Opinion
The record in this case shows that the judgment ■appealed from is not complete — it is not signed by the district judge. Code of Practice, art. 546; 17 La. 485; 4 R. 52 ; 3 An. 62; 12 An. 756.
It is therefore ordered that the appeal be dismissed, at the cost of the defendants and appellants.
Rehearing refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Trost v. Fox, 22 La. Ann. 410 (La. 1870).
22 La. Ann. 410 (Trost v. Fox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.