Tropical Chevrolet, Inc. v. Kehr

Supreme Court of Florida

Tropical Chevrolet, Inc. v. Kehr

161 So. 2d 830, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2872

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 25, 1964·No. No. 33023·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date August 23, 1963.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd-. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date August 23, 1963.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd-. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Tropical Chevrolet, Inc. v. Kehr, 161 So. 2d 830, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2872 (Fla. 1964).

Pincite

161 So. 2d 830 (Tropical Chevrolet, Inc. v. Kehr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related