Tropical Chevrolet, Inc. v. G. A. C. Finance Corp. of Miami

127 So. 2d 476, 1961 Fla. App. LEXIS 2956
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 6, 1961·No. No. 60-312·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of G.F.C. Corporation v. Spradlin, Fla. 1949, 38 So.2d 679, without prejudice to appellant to demand payment out of any excess proceeds of sale of the automobile by appellee. See Intertype Corporation v. Pulver, 101 Fla. 1176, 1180, 132 So. 830, 135 So. 793; Id., D.C.S.D. Fla.1932, 2 F.Supp. 4; Id., 5 Cir., 1933, 65 F.2d 419; Colonial Finance, Inc. v. All Miami Ford, Inc., Fla.App.1959, 112 So.2d 857.

HORTON, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tropical Chevrolet, Inc. v. G. A. C. Finance Corp. of Miami, 127 So. 2d 476, 1961 Fla. App. LEXIS 2956 (Fla. Ct. App. 1961).

127 So. 2d 476 (Tropical Chevrolet, Inc. v. G. A. C. Finance Corp. of Miami) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Huff v. Belcastro
127 So. 2d 476 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)