Tropeano v. Matthews

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tropeano v. Matthews

281 So. 2d 251, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7647

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 31, 1973·No. No. 72-1052·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment based upon the entry of a directed verdict. From a review of the record we are of the opinion that there was sufficient evidence on which the jury could have lawfully found for the plaintiff, and, therefore, the verdict should not have been directed. Jones v. Smith etc., Fourth District Court of Appeal, 279 So.2d 343, opinion filed June 20, 1973; see also Zimmerman v. Langlais, Fla.App.1971, 248 So.2d 694; and 32 Fla.Jur. Trial § 93. The final judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed.

OWEN, C. J., and CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment based upon the entry of a directed verdict. From a review of the record we are of the opinion that there was sufficient evidence on which the jury could have lawfully found for the plaintiff, and, therefore, the verdict should not have been directed. Jones v. Smith etc., Fourth District Court of Appeal, 279 So.2d 343, opinion filed June 20, 1973; see also Zimmerman v. Langlais, Fla.App.1971, 248 So.2d 694; and 32 Fla.Jur. Trial § 93. The final judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed.

OWEN, C. J., and CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Tropeano v. Matthews, 281 So. 2d 251, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7647 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

281 So. 2d 251 (Tropeano v. Matthews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related