Troob v. Hertz
163 A.D. 908, 147 N.Y.S. 1146
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1914
StatusPublished
This text of 163 A.D. 908 (Troob v. Hertz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Troob v. Hertz, 163 A.D. 908, 147 N.Y.S. 1146 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).
Opinion
Order of the County Court of Kings county affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to an application by plaintiff to the Special Term for leave to amend his complaint on appropriate terms. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr,' Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
163 A.D. 908, 147 N.Y.S. 1146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/troob-v-hertz-nyappdiv-1914.