Tron v. Sinclair Refining Co.
This text of 199 N.C. 816 (Tron v. Sinclair Refining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tbe petition for removal, besides showing tbe presence-of tbe requisite jurisdictional amount, asserts a right of removal on tbe ground of diverse citizenship, and alleges that tbe resident defendants have been fraudulently joined to prevent such removal.
No new question of law is presented by tbe appeal. Tbe trial court held that tbe case was controlled by tbe line of decisions of which Givens v. Mfg. Co., 196 N. C., 377, 145 S. E., 681, and Crisp v. Fibre Co., 193 N. C., 77, 136 S. E., 238, may be cited as fairly illustrative, while tbe appellant contends that tbe principles announced in Cox v. Lumber Co., 193 N. C., 28, 136 S. E., 254; Johnson v. Lumber Co., 189 N. C., 81, 126 S. E., 165, and Rea v. Mirror Co., 158 N. C., 24, 73 S. E., 116, are more nearly applicable. No error in tbe ruling of tbe trial court has been shown.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
199 N.C. 816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tron-v-sinclair-refining-co-nc-1930.