Trompeter v. Boise Cascade Corp.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Trompeter v. Boise Cascade Corp.

805 N.W.2d 239, 2011 Minn. LEXIS 688, 2011 WL 5282719

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedOctober 26, 2011

DocketNo. A11-1047

StatusPublished

This text of 805 N.W.2d 239 (Trompeter v. Boise Cascade Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trompeter v. Boise Cascade Corp., 805 N.W.2d 239, 2011 Minn. LEXIS 688, 2011 WL 5282719 (Mich. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed May 18, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

MEYER, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Lorie S. Gildea Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI