Trompeter v. Boise Cascade Corp.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Trompeter v. Boise Cascade Corp.

805 N.W.2d 239, 2011 Minn. LEXIS 688, 2011 WL 5282719

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided October 26, 2011·No. No. A11-1047·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed May 18, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

MEYER, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Lorie S. Gildea Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed May 18, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

MEYER, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Lorie S. Gildea Chief Justice

Trompeter v. Boise Cascade Corp., 805 N.W.2d 239, 2011 Minn. LEXIS 688, 2011 WL 5282719 (Mich. 2011).

Pincite

805 N.W.2d 239 (Trompeter v. Boise Cascade Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related