Trombley v. State

Florida Circuit Courts

Trombley v. State

35 Fla. Supp. 2d 89

CourtCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida

DecidedJuly 5, 1989

DocketCase No. 87-0081AC (County Court Case No. 87-9264MM10)

StatusPublished

This text of 35 Fla. Supp. 2d 89 (Trombley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trombley v. State, 35 Fla. Supp. 2d 89 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PATTI E. HENNING, Circuit Judge.

THIS CAUSE having come before this Court upon Appellant’s appeal of the judgment and sentence imposed upon him by the trial court, the Court, having received appellate briefs, having heard oral argument of counsel on Wednesday, June 18, 1989, and being fully advised in the premises, finds that:

Appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial Court abused its discretion in allowing the tape recordings into evidence for purpose of rebuttal. Jent v State, 408 So.2d 1024 (Fla. 1981). Indeed this evidence was properly admitted. Jones v State, 385 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

[90]*90Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, it is hereby,

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Judgment and Sentence of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, at the Broward County. Courthouse, 201 Southeast Sixth Street, Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida 33301, this 5th day of July, 1989.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PATTI E. HENNING, Circuit Judge.

THIS CAUSE having come before this Court upon Appellant’s appeal of the judgment and sentence imposed upon him by the trial court, the Court, having received appellate briefs, having heard oral argument of counsel on Wednesday, June 18, 1989, and being fully advised in the premises, finds that:

Appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial Court abused its discretion in allowing the tape recordings into evidence for purpose of rebuttal. Jent v State, 408 So.2d 1024 (Fla. 1981). Indeed this evidence was properly admitted. Jones v State, 385 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

[90]*90Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, it is hereby,

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Judgment and Sentence of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, at the Broward County. Courthouse, 201 Southeast Sixth Street, Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida 33301, this 5th day of July, 1989.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Fla. Supp. 2d 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trombley-v-state-flacirct-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack