Trollinger v. Florida Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Florida

Trollinger v. Florida Industrial Commission

191 So. 2d 426

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedOctober 26, 1966

DocketNo. 35560

StatusPublished

This text of 191 So. 2d 426 (Trollinger v. Florida Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trollinger v. Florida Industrial Commission, 191 So. 2d 426 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May 19, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

Petition for Attorney’s fees also is denied.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, ' JJ-, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI