Troller v. Michel
This text of 275 A.D.2d 721 (Troller v. Michel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[722]*722The “ Third ” and “ Seventh ” defenses were improperly struck out. They allege facts which may be found to affect the right of the plaintiffs to an injunction. (Home Ins. Co. v. Gillespie Loading Co., 222 App. Div. 67; Schwartz v. Klein, 272 App. Div. 834; Straus v. American Publishers’ Assn., 103 App. Div. 277.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Mac-Crate, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 A.D.2d 721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/troller-v-michel-nyappdiv-1949.