Troise v. Extel Communications, Inc.
808 A.2d 96, 174 N.J. 375, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1469
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Skillman’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 345 N.J.Super. 231, 784 A.2d 748 (2001).
For affirming — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI and ALBIN — 7.
Opposed — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Troise v. Extel Communications, Inc., 808 A.2d 96, 174 N.J. 375, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1469 (N.J. 2002).
808 A.2d 96 (Troise v. Extel Communications, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Angel Cruz v. Aspen Landscaping Contracting Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2024
Morristown Associates v. Grant Oil Co.
74 A.3d 968 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2013)
Clark v. People
221 P.3d 447 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2009)
Best v. C & M Door Controls, Inc.
953 A.2d 775 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2008)