Troise v. Extel Communications, Inc.
808 A.2d 96, 174 N.J. 375, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1469
This text of 808 A.2d 96 (Troise v. Extel Communications, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Troise v. Extel Communications, Inc., 808 A.2d 96, 174 N.J. 375, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1469 (N.J. 2002).
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Skillman’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 345 N.J.Super. 231, 784 A.2d 748 (2001).
For affirming — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI and ALBIN — 7.
Opposed — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Angel Cruz v. Aspen Landscaping Contracting Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2024
Morristown Associates v. Grant Oil Co.
74 A.3d 968 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2013)
Clark v. People
221 P.3d 447 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2009)
Best v. C & M Door Controls, Inc.
953 A.2d 775 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2008)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
808 A.2d 96, 174 N.J. 375, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/troise-v-extel-communications-inc-nj-2002.