Trogdon v. Trogdon

388 S.E.2d 212, 97 N.C. App. 330, 1990 N.C. App. LEXIS 59
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided February 6, 1990·No. 8921DC95·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PHILLIPS, Judge.

Plaintiff sued for an absolute divorce; defendant counterclaimed for an order of equitable distribution but died before either claim could be adjudicated. The appeal is from the denial of the petition of the administrator of defendant’s estate to be allowed to substitute for the defendant in the action.

The appeal has no merit. Permitting the administrator of defendant’s estate to enter the case would avail nothing. The order of equitable distribution that defendant counterclaimed for cannot be obtained because he and plaintiff were not divorced as G.S. 50-21(a) requires, McKenzie v. McKenzie, 75 N.C. App. 188, 330 S.E.2d 270 (1985); and they can never be divorced since the marriage was dissolved by death. Caldwell v. Caldwell, 93 N.C. App. *331 740, 379 S.E.2d 271, disc. rev. denied, 325 N.C. 270, 384 S.E.2d 513 (1989).

Affirmed.

Judges Wells and Parker concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trogdon v. Trogdon, 388 S.E.2d 212, 97 N.C. App. 330, 1990 N.C. App. LEXIS 59 (N.C. Ct. App. 1990).

388 S.E.2d 212 (Trogdon v. Trogdon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tucker v. Miller
440 S.E.2d 315 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1994)