Troestrum v. American-West African Line, Inc.
This text of 254 A.D. 784 (Troestrum v. American-West African Line, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Counsel for respondent on argument of appeal having stated that plaintiff’s proofs at the trial will be limited to the bill of particulars, contained in the record on appeal at page 10, the order granting plaintiff’s motion to strike out the second separate defense contained in the answer is affirmed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Davis, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 A.D. 784, 6 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/troestrum-v-american-west-african-line-inc-nyappdiv-1938.