Troescher v. Clark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Troescher v. Clark

243 A.D. 800, 278 N.Y.S. 722

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 800 (Troescher v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Troescher v. Clark, 243 A.D. 800, 278 N.Y.S. 722 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Order modified by providing that the defendant appear, to give testimony, in addition to the matters contained in item 7 of the plaintiff’s notice of motion, as to the matters covered by items 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of said notice of motion; and that upon such examination the defendant produce cheeks and check stubs for the purpose of refreshing the witness’ recollection, and other records in any way showing the support and contribution by him to Margaret Clark Troescher. The examination is to proceed before the Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau county, upon five days’ notice after the entry of the order. As so modified, the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified by providing that the defendant appear, to give testimony, in addition to the matters contained in item 7 of the plaintiff’s notice of motion, as to the matters covered by items 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of said notice of motion; and that upon such examination the defendant produce cheeks and check stubs for the purpose of refreshing the witness’ recollection, and other records in any way showing the support and contribution by him to Margaret Clark Troescher. The examination is to proceed before the Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau county, upon five days’ notice after the entry of the order. As so modified, the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 800, 278 N.Y.S. 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/troescher-v-clark-nyappdiv-1935.