Troche-Vazquez v. State

114 So. 3d 422, 2013 WL 2359076
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 31, 2013
DocketNo. 5D12-4367
StatusPublished

This text of 114 So. 3d 422 (Troche-Vazquez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Troche-Vazquez v. State, 114 So. 3d 422, 2013 WL 2359076 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Fernando Troche-Vazquez (defendant) appeals the order entered by the trial court denying his rule 3.800(a) motion [423]*423claiming additional jail credit.1 The defendant has failed to present a facially sufficient claim since the alleged additional credit cannot be ascertained from the face of the record. See Cabrera v. State, 62 So.3d 1171 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order without prejudice to the defendant’s presenting his claim in a rule 3.850 motion.2

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, LAWSON and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cabrera v. State
62 So. 3d 1171 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 So. 3d 422, 2013 WL 2359076, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/troche-vazquez-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.