Trobock v. Caro

California Supreme Court

Trobock v. Caro

60 Cal. 304, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 453

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 27, 1882

DocketNo. 7,530

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 60 Cal. 304 (Trobock v. Caro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trobock v. Caro, 60 Cal. 304, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 453 (Cal. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court :

This was an action brought to recover rent due for three months of the year 1879, upon a lease of certain premises in the City and County of San Francisco. The defense was that the lease was void, because the premises were let for an illegal purpose. But the Court found that they were not let for an illegal purpose. Even if there were a conflict of evidence the finding would not be disturbed; but the evidence in the record fully sustains the finding.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court :

This was an action brought to recover rent due for three months of the year 1879, upon a lease of certain premises in the City and County of San Francisco. The defense was that the lease was void, because the premises were let for an illegal purpose. But the Court found that they were not let for an illegal purpose. Even if there were a conflict of evidence the finding would not be disturbed; but the evidence in the record fully sustains the finding.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 Cal. 304, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trobock-v-caro-cal-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack