Triway Construction Corp. v. Neuss Construction Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Triway Construction Corp. v. Neuss Construction Co.

54 A.D.2d 563, 386 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13886

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 20, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 563 (Triway Construction Corp. v. Neuss Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Triway Construction Corp. v. Neuss Construction Co., 54 A.D.2d 563, 386 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover (1) for work performed under a subcontract and (2) on the construction bond, defendant Glens Falls Insurance Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered January 8, 1976, which denied its motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The bases advanced by appellant in support of its motion for summary judgment raise triable issues of fact, as Special Term determined. We note the decision which appellant has included in its brief, in what appears to be a related case. That decision was not before Special Term and is not part of the record on appeal. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Margett, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover (1) for work performed under a subcontract and (2) on the construction bond, defendant Glens Falls Insurance Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered January 8, 1976, which denied its motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The bases advanced by appellant in support of its motion for summary judgment raise triable issues of fact, as Special Term determined. We note the decision which appellant has included in its brief, in what appears to be a related case. That decision was not before Special Term and is not part of the record on appeal. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Margett, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 563, 386 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/triway-construction-corp-v-neuss-construction-co-nyappdiv-1976.