Trivett v. Diaz

410 F. App'x 646
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 14, 2011
DocketNo. 10-6936
StatusPublished

This text of 410 F. App'x 646 (Trivett v. Diaz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trivett v. Diaz, 410 F. App'x 646 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Trivett appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and under the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Trivett v. Diaz, No. 5:08-ct-03103-D, 2010 WL 2572780 (E.D.N.C. June 24, 2010). We deny the motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
410 F. App'x 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trivett-v-diaz-ca4-2011.