Trivedi v. Golub

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Trivedi v. Golub

90 A.D.3d 1031, 934 N.Y.2d 836

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 27, 2011

StatusPublished

This text of 90 A.D.3d 1031 (Trivedi v. Golub) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trivedi v. Golub, 90 A.D.3d 1031, 934 N.Y.2d 836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it for the plaintiff’s failure to restore the action to the trial calendar, and denying the plaintiffs cross motion to restore the action to the trial calendar. Skelos, J.E, Angiolillo, Belen, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it for the plaintiff’s failure to restore the action to the trial calendar, and denying the plaintiffs cross motion to restore the action to the trial calendar. Skelos, J.E, Angiolillo, Belen, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 A.D.3d 1031, 934 N.Y.2d 836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trivedi-v-golub-nyappdiv-2011.