TRITZANT v. Kansas City Power & Light Company

262 S.W.3d 696, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1212, 2008 WL 4200606
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 16, 2008
DocketWD 68308
StatusPublished

This text of 262 S.W.3d 696 (TRITZANT v. Kansas City Power & Light Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
TRITZANT v. Kansas City Power & Light Company, 262 S.W.3d 696, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1212, 2008 WL 4200606 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Arnoldo Tritzant appeals the denial of his motion for new trial, following a defense verdict on false arrest and malicious prosecution claims he filed against Kansas City Power & Light Company. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 S.W.3d 696, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1212, 2008 WL 4200606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tritzant-v-kansas-city-power-light-company-moctapp-2008.