Triton Holdings, Inc. v. First Union National Bank of Florida
723 So. 2d 377, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 16445, 1998 WL 904110
This text of 723 So. 2d 377 (Triton Holdings, Inc. v. First Union National Bank of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Triton Holdings, Inc. v. First Union National Bank of Florida, 723 So. 2d 377, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 16445, 1998 WL 904110 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
Opinion
Contrary to the appellant’s arguments, joint depositors must both be served with notice of garnishment proceedings to comport with due process of law. See § 77.055, Fla. Stat. (1995). Accordingly, the trial court was correct in finding that the notice was deficient.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
723 So. 2d 377, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 16445, 1998 WL 904110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/triton-holdings-inc-v-first-union-national-bank-of-florida-fladistctapp-1998.