Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/TRISTRAM v. State

TRISTRAM v. State

3 So. 3d 433, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1469, 2009 WL 416642
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 20, 2009
Docket4D09-313
StatusPublished

This text of 3 So. 3d 433 (TRISTRAM v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
TRISTRAM v. State, 3 So. 3d 433, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1469, 2009 WL 416642 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Tristram appeals an order summarily denying his rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. Having granted his *434 request for expedited review, we reverse and remand. The trial court should have afforded Tristram the opportunity to amend his motion to allege that the plea in this case alone subjects him to deportation. Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007); Brown v. State, 992 So.2d 915 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Forrest v. State, 988 So.2d 38 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Reversed and Remanded for further proceedings.

FARMER, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Forrest v. State
988 So. 2d 38 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Brown v. State
992 So. 2d 915 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Spera v. State
971 So. 2d 754 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 So. 3d 433, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1469, 2009 WL 416642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tristram-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.