TRISTRAM v. State

3 So. 3d 433, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1469, 2009 WL 416642
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 20, 2009·No. 4D09-313·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Tristram appeals an order summarily denying his rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. Having granted his *434 request for expedited review, we reverse and remand. The trial court should have afforded Tristram the opportunity to amend his motion to allege that the plea in this case alone subjects him to deportation. Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007); Brown v. State, 992 So.2d 915 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Forrest v. State, 988 So.2d 38 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Reversed and Remanded for further proceedings.

FARMER, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TRISTRAM v. State, 3 So. 3d 433, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1469, 2009 WL 416642 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

3 So. 3d 433 (TRISTRAM v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Forrest v. State
988 So. 2d 38 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Brown v. State
992 So. 2d 915 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Spera v. State
971 So. 2d 754 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)