Trista Jones v. RK Enterprises of Blytheville
Opinion
In this appeal following a remand, see Trista Jones v. RK Enterprises of Blytheville, Inc., 632 Fed.Appx. 306 (8th Cir. 2016) (unpublished per curiam), Trista Jones appeals from an order of the district court 1 granting a reduced award of attorney’s fees. We conclude the district court properly determined the attorney’s fee award in accordance with the lodestar approach and Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 433-34, 103 S.Ct. 1933, 76 L.Ed.2d 40 (1983). We also conclude the court was within its discretion in reducing the award based on the limited success achieved. See H.J. Inc. v. Flygt Corp., 925 F.2d 257, 260-61 (8th Cir. 1991). Finally, Jones is not entitled to fees for this appeal as she is not a prevailing party. Cf. 8th Cir. R. 47C.
The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Billy Roy Wilson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
672 F. App'x 613 (Trista Jones v. RK Enterprises of Blytheville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.