Trischler v. Universal Potteries, Inc.

171 F.2d 707, 23 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2242
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedDecember 14, 1948
DocketNo. 10691
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 171 F.2d 707 (Trischler v. Universal Potteries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trischler v. Universal Potteries, Inc., 171 F.2d 707, 23 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2242 (6th Cir. 1948).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel;

And it appearing that the appeal arises out of an action instituted under the provisions of Section 308, Title 50, U.S.C. Appendix, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 308, and that the appellants, all of whom were employees of appellee Universal Potteries, Inc., prior to their induction into the armed forces, were all re-employed by Universal Potteries, Inc., when they returned from service in the armed forces, in their former positions at their former pay rates, plus any general increases in pay for the industry;

And it appearing that each of the appellants has failed to prove that appellee Universal Potteries, Inc., has not considered him as having been on furlough or leave of absence during his period of training in service in the land or naval forces;

And it appearing that each of the appellants has failed to prove that he has not been restored without loss of seniority, or that he is not participating in insurance or other benefits offered by the employer pursuant to established rules and practices relating to employees on furlough or leave of absence in effect with the employer at the time he was inducted into the armed forces Section 308(e), Title 50, U.S.C.Appendix, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 308(e);

And it appearing that the findings of fact of the District Court are adequate and complete and are amply supported by the record:

It is ordered that the judgment, D.C., 78 F.Supp. 609, be, and hereby is, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bostian v. Seaboard Air Line R. Co.
211 F.2d 867 (Fourth Circuit, 1954)
Zaversnik v. Union Pac. R.
95 F. Supp. 209 (D. Wyoming, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 F.2d 707, 23 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trischler-v-universal-potteries-inc-ca6-1948.