Trippe v. McLain

13 S.E. 523, 87 Ga. 536, 1891 Ga. LEXIS 217
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 13, 1891·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

TJuder the evidence in the record, the trial of this case in the court below had an improper result. The machinery was purchased at the price of $600.00, and [537] by the undisputed testimony, an expenditure of $50.00 would be sufficient to repair it and make it perform good work. It is therefore not worthless so as to entitle the purchaser to keep' it without paying for it, although in its present condition it may be inefficient, and if left in that condition always, would be worthless. Granting that there was no substantial error committed by the court in its charge to the jury, or otherwise during the progress of the trial, the verdict is not sustainable, and a new trial should be had for that reason. The court erred in not granting it.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trippe v. McLain, 13 S.E. 523, 87 Ga. 536, 1891 Ga. LEXIS 217 (Ga. 1891).

13 S.E. 523 (Trippe v. McLain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Colt Co. v. Armstead
135 S.E. 317 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Felder v. Neeves
135 S.E. 219 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Worth-Huskey Coal Co. v. Columbia Malting Co.
230 Ill. App. 165 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1923)
Thompson Oil Mill Co. v. Murray Co.
91 S.E. 217 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
International Harvester Co. of America v. Adams
68 S.E. 1093 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)